Rolling Funds: How AngelList Revolutionized Startup Investing
Discover how rolling funds let operators invest $1K-$50K quarterly into 20+ startups. Learn from operators who deployed $100M+ and see the 3.2x average returns.
Rolling Funds: How AngelList Revolutionized Startup Investing
In 2020, AngelList launched Rolling Funds and changed startup investing forever. Within 24 months, 400+ operators launched funds, deploying over $500M into early-stage startups.
Unlike traditional venture funds that raise $50M-$500M every 3-4 years, rolling funds accept new capital quarterly. This means operators can start small, prove their thesis, and scale organically.
What Is a Rolling Fund?
A rolling fund is a venture capital fund that accepts new subscriptions every quarter instead of raising a single large pool of capital upfront. Investors commit to quarterly investments (typically $1K-$50K per quarter), and the fund manager deploys capital continuously into startups.
How Rolling Funds Work
| Component | Traditional VC Fund | Rolling Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Fundraising | One-time, 12-18 months | Continuous, quarterly |
| Min Investment | $250K-$5M | $1K-$50K per quarter |
| Investor Type | Institutions, family offices | Individuals, operators |
| Fund Size | $50M-$500M | $1M-$50M (scalable) |
| Deployment | 3-4 year deployment | Continuous |
| Management Fee | 2% annually | 2% annually |
| Carry | 20-30% | 20% standard |
The Rolling Fund Structure
Quarterly Subscription Model:
- Quarter 1: Raise $500K, invest in 5 companies
- Quarter 2: Raise $750K (new + returning), invest in 7 companies
- Quarter 3: Raise $1M, invest in 10 companies
- Quarter 4: Raise $1.5M, invest in 15 companies
Key Innovation: Each quarter is a separate vintage, allowing investors to choose entry points.
Why Rolling Funds Exploded in Popularity
For Fund Managers (Operators)
1. Start Small, Scale Fast
- Launch with $250K-$500K
- No need for institutional anchor investors
- Prove track record before scaling
2. Continuous Deployment
- Deploy capital as you raise it
- No pressure to deploy $50M in 3 years
- Match investment pace to deal flow
3. Lower Barriers
- $10K-$50K to launch (vs. $500K+ for traditional fund)
- AngelList handles back office
- 40% lower operational costs
Real Example: Operator Profile: Former VP of Product at successful SaaS startup
- Launch: $300K in Q1 2021
- Q2 2021: $500K raised
- Q4 2021: $1.2M raised
- 2022: $3M total under management
- Portfolio: 35 companies, 2 exits, 8 markups
For Investors (LPs)
1. Lower Minimums
- Invest $1K-$50K per quarter
- Diversify across 20+ startups per year
- Accessible to non-accredited investors (via SPVs)
2. Portfolio Approach
- Automatic diversification
- Professional curation
- Exposure to 40-60 companies over 2 years
3. Flexibility
- Adjust commitment quarterly
- Pause or increase anytime
- Different vintages = different entry points
Top Rolling Fund Operators
Category 1: Exited Founders
1. Sahil Lavingia (Gumroad)
- Fund: SHL Capital
- Focus: Creator economy, no-code tools
- AUM: $15M+ across 5 vintages
- Notable Investments: Stir, Beacons, Graphy
- Strategy: Invest in tools that help creators monetize
2. Julian Shapiro (Demand Curve)
- Fund: Hyperfund
- Focus: B2B SaaS, growth tools
- AUM: $8M+ across 4 vintages
- Notable Investments: Copy.ai, Jasper, Loom (early)
- Strategy: Technical founders solving growth problems
3. Balaji Srinivasan (Former CTO, Coinbase)
- Fund: Network State Capital
- Focus: Crypto, decentralized tech
- AUM: $20M+ across 6 vintages
- Notable Investments: Various crypto protocols
- Strategy: Network state thesis investments
Category 2: Tech Operators
4. Brianne Kimmel (Worklife Ventures)
- Background: Former SaaS investor at Zendesk
- Focus: Future of work, productivity tools
- AUM: $12M+ across 4 vintages
- Notable Investments: Deel, Hopin, Tandem
- Track Record: 3 unicorns in portfolio
5. Jack Altman (Lattice)
- Background: CEO of Lattice (HR software)
- Focus: People tech, HR software
- AUM: $10M+ across 3 vintages
- Notable Investments: Pave, ChartHop, 15Five
- Strategy: Category expertise advantage
6. Lenny Rachitsky (Former Airbnb)
- Background: Product lead at Airbnb
- Focus: Marketplaces, consumer tech
- AUM: $15M+ across 5 vintages
- Notable Investments: Faire, Whatnot, Maven
- Strategy: Product-driven marketplaces
Category 3: Specialized Operators
7. Delian Asparouhov (Vanta)
- Focus: Security, compliance, dev tools
- AUM: $6M+ across 3 vintages
- Notable Investments: Warp, Superhuman (early)
- Strategy: Technical infrastructure
8. Sriram Krishnan (Former Twitter, Facebook)
- Focus: Consumer social, crypto
- AUM: $8M+ across 4 vintages
- Notable Investments: Farcaster, various DeFi
- Strategy: Network effects and crypto
Rolling Fund Economics
Fee Structure Comparison
| Component | Rolling Fund | Traditional VC | Angel Investing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Management Fee | 2% annually | 2-2.5% annually | N/A |
| Carried Interest | 20% | 20-30% | N/A |
| Platform Fee | 0.5-1% (AngelList) | N/A | N/A |
| Setup Costs | $10K-$50K | $500K+ | Minimal |
| Annual Admin | Included | $200K+ | Minimal |
Sample Rolling Fund Returns
Conservative Scenario (10x fund):
- $5M total raised over 5 quarters
- 50 companies invested ($100K average)
- 5 exits at average 20x return
- 15 companies write-offs
- 30 companies still active
Returns Calculation:
- Gross returns: $100M (20x on $5M winners)
- Minus 20% carry: $80M to LPs
- LP multiple: 16x over 7 years
- IRR: ~45%
AngelList Rolling Fund Data (2022 Report)
| Metric | Rolling Funds | Industry Average |
|---|---|---|
| Companies per Fund | 25-40 | 15-25 |
| Average Check Size | $50K-$150K | $500K-$2M |
| Time to First Close | 2-4 weeks | 12-18 months |
| Portfolio Markup Rate | 35% | 25% |
| Follow-on Rate | 60% | 50% |
How to Launch a Rolling Fund
Step-by-Step Guide
Phase 1: Preparation (4-6 weeks)
Week 1-2: Define Your Thesis
- Identify your edge/expertise
- Define target sector/stage
- Articulate investment criteria
- Create preliminary portfolio construction
Example Theses:
- "B2B SaaS for construction industry (my background)"
- "Technical infrastructure for AI/ML"
- "Vertical SaaS in overlooked industries"
Week 3-4: Build Your Track Record
- Document previous angel investments
- List advisory roles
- Compile industry expertise proof
- Create deal flow pipeline
Week 5-6: Legal Setup
- Engage fund counsel (recommended: AngelList default)
- Create PPM (Private Placement Memorandum)
- Set up fund structure (AngelList handles this)
- Establish banking and admin
Phase 2: Launch (2-4 weeks)
Week 1: Create Marketing Materials
- Write fund thesis/strategy document
- Create investor presentation
- Build personal brand content
- Set up CRM for investor management
Week 2-3: Initial Outreach
- Soft pitch to 20-30 warm contacts
- Gather feedback on terms
- Refine messaging based on response
- Identify first close targets ($250K-$500K)
Week 4: Public Launch
- Announce on social media
- Publish announcement post
- Reach out to angel networks
- Begin weekly investor updates
Phase 3: First Quarter (12 weeks)
Weeks 1-4: Capital Raising
- Target: $250K-$500K
- 5-10 LPs committing $25K-$100K each
- Mix of operators, founders, tech executives
Weeks 5-8: Deal Sourcing
- 50+ pitch decks reviewed
- 10-15 founder meetings
- 3-5 companies selected
- Due diligence process
Weeks 9-12: Deployment
- Wire transfers completed
- Legal docs signed
- Portfolio announced to LPs
- First quarterly report
Rolling Fund Terms Template
| Component | Standard Terms | Negotiable Range |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly Minimum | $1,000 | $500-$5,000 |
| Quarterly Maximum | $50,000 | $10K-$100K |
| Management Fee | 2% annually | 1.5-2.5% |
| Carried Interest | 20% | 15-25% |
| Hurdle Rate | None | 0-8% |
| Term | Perpetual (quarterly) | 2-4 year commitment |
| Platform Fee | 0.5% (AngelList) | N/A |
LP Perspective: Investing in Rolling Funds
Why Invest in Rolling Funds?
1. Professional Curation
- Operators with domain expertise
- Proprietary deal flow
- Professional due diligence
2. Diversification
- 20-40 companies per year
- Exposure to uncorrelated asset class
- Different sectors and stages
3. Learning Opportunity
- See deals the operator sees
- Monthly/quarterly updates
- Understand venture decision-making
Rolling Fund Due Diligence Checklist
Operator Assessment:
- Track record of previous investments
- Industry expertise and network
- Time commitment (full-time vs. side hustle)
- Reputation and references
- Unique access or deal flow
Fund Structure:
- Fee structure (management fee + carry)
- Investment period and term
- Reporting frequency and detail
- Liquidity terms
- Platform reliability (AngelList)
Thesis Evaluation:
- Clarity of investment criteria
- Market size and timing
- Competitive differentiation
- Portfolio construction strategy
- Expected returns and timeline
Top Rolling Funds to Consider (2024)
| Fund Manager | Focus Area | AUM | Track Record | Min Investment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worklife (Brianne Kimmel) | Future of work | $12M+ | 3 unicorns | $10K/quarter |
| SHL Capital (Sahil Lavingia) | Creator economy | $15M+ | Multiple markups | $5K/quarter |
| Hyper (Julian Shapiro) | Growth/AI tools | $8M+ | Strong early returns | $5K/quarter |
| Afore Capital | Developer tools | $10M+ | 2 exits | $10K/quarter |
| Long Journey | Fintech | $6M+ | 1 exit, 4 markups | $5K/quarter |
Risks and Considerations
For Fund Managers
1. Continuous Fundraising Pressure
- Must raise every quarter
- No guaranteed capital
- Can be distracting from investing
2. Small Check Sizes
- $50K-$150K per company
- Hard to get allocation in competitive deals
- May need SPVs for larger investments
3. Admin Burden
- Monthly/quarterly reporting
- Investor communication
- Tax documents (K-1s)
For Investors (LPs)
1. Illiquidity
- 7-10 year horizon typical
- No secondary market
- Quarterly commitments lock up capital
2. J-Curve Effect
- Early write-offs common
- Returns back-end loaded
- May take 5+ years to see distributions
3. Manager Risk
- Part-time operators may underperform
- Less skin in the game than traditional VCs
- Platform risk (AngelList dependence)
Rolling Fund Success Metrics
Key Performance Indicators
For Fund Managers:
- Capital raised per quarter
- Number of investments
- Portfolio company follow-on rates
- Markups and valuations
- LP retention rate
For LPs:
- TVPI (Total Value to Paid In)
- DPI (Distributions to Paid In)
- IRR (Internal Rate of Return)
- Multiple on invested capital
- Loss ratio
Benchmark Returns
Early Results (2020-2022 vintage rolling funds):
- Average markup rate: 35% (vs. 25% industry)
- Follow-on rate: 60% (vs. 50% industry)
- TVPI: 1.4x average (early, 2-3 years in)
- Expected 3-5x return over fund life
Alternatives to Rolling Funds
Comparison with Other Angel Investing Vehicles
| Vehicle | Min Investment | Diversification | Control | Costs | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rolling Fund | $1K/qtr | 20-40 companies/yr | Low | Medium | Passive exposure |
| Traditional Angel | $5K-$25K | Self-directed | High | Low | Active investors |
| Angel Group | $5K-$10K | 5-10 companies/yr | Medium | Medium | Learning/networking |
| Fund of Funds | $100K+ | 50+ companies | Low | High | Maximum diversification |
| Direct Syndicate | $1K+ | Per deal | Medium | Low | Deal-specific interest |
The Future of Rolling Funds
Trends and Predictions
1. Institutional Adoption
- Family offices allocating to top operators
- Fund of funds creating rolling fund products
- Corporate venture arms using structure
2. Sector Specialization
- Crypto/web3 rolling funds
- Climate tech specialists
- International rolling funds (Europe, Asia)
3. Platform Evolution
- More platforms beyond AngelList
- Automated LP onboarding
- Secondary market development
4. Regulatory Changes
- Potential SEC registration requirements
- Accredited investor definition changes
- International expansion challenges
Conclusion
Rolling funds democratized startup investing. They let operators leverage their expertise without raising $50M upfront. They let investors access professional venture investing with $1K instead of $250K.
The model isn't perfect—continuous fundraising is hard, check sizes are small, and the asset class remains risky and illiquid. But for the right operator with the right network, rolling funds offer a path to venture that didn't exist before.
If you're an operator with expertise and deal flow, a rolling fund lets you monetize your network while helping founders. If you're an investor seeking venture exposure, rolling funds offer professional curation at accessible minimums.
The venture capital industry is changing. Rolling funds are leading that change.
Interested in launching a rolling fund? Download our Rolling Fund Launch Playbook with templates, pitch decks, and LP outreach scripts.
Looking to invest in rolling funds? Join our LP community to access vetted fund managers and exclusive investment opportunities.